Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Review

Systematic review of clinical debriefing tools: attributes and evidence for use.

Phillips EC, Smith SE, Tallentire VR, et al. Systematic review of clinical debriefing tools: attributes and evidence for use. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024;33(3):187-198. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015464.

Save
Print
April 19, 2023
Phillips EC, Smith SE, Tallentire VR, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024;33(3):187-198.
View more articles from the same authors.

Debriefing after clinical events is an important opportunity for critical learning, process improvement, and enhancing team communication. This systematic review of 21 studies synthesized findings regarding the attributes and evidence supporting the use of clinical debriefing tools. While all of the evaluated tools included points related to education and evaluation, few tools included a process for implementing change or addressed staff emotions. The authors include recommendations for clinicians, educators and researchers for teaching, implementing and evaluating clinical debriefing tools.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Phillips EC, Smith SE, Tallentire VR, et al. Systematic review of clinical debriefing tools: attributes and evidence for use. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024;33(3):187-198. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015464.