Levels of agreement on the grading, analysis and reporting of significant events by general practitioners: a cross-sectional study. | PSNet

Provide Feedback |

Register

Study

Levels of agreement on the grading, analysis and reporting of significant events by general practitioners: a cross-sectional study.

October 29, 2008

McKay J, Bowie P, Murray L, et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(5):339-45.

View more articles from the same authors.

This study surveyed general practitioners and discovered high levels of agreement for what were deemed significant events. The authors point out the continuing challenges of engaging providers to use reporting systems, and their willingness to include patients in the learning process.

PubMed citation

Related Resources From the Same Author(s)

A review of significant events analysed in general practice: implications for the quality and safety of patient care.

October 14, 2009

A qualitative study of why general practitioners may participate in significant event analysis and educational peer assessment.

April 6, 2011

A review of the current evidence base for significant event analysis.

August 27, 2008

Physician and nurse well-being and preferred interventions to address burnout in hospital practice: factors associated with turnover, outcomes, and patient safety.

July 19, 2023

Patient safety skills in primary care: a national survey of GP educators.

February 4, 2015

Do we know what foundation year doctors think about patient safety incident reporting? Development of a web based tool to assess attitude and knowledge.

November 7, 2011

Laboratory test ordering and results management systems: a qualitative study of safety risks identified by administrators in general practice.

March 12, 2014

Implementation of the trigger review method in Scottish general practices: patient safety outcomes and potential for quality improvement.

April 12, 2017

System hazards in managing laboratory test requests and results in primary care: medical protection database analysis and conceptual model.

January 20, 2016

Using a potentially aggressive/violent patient huddle to improve health care safety.

February 27, 2019

View More

Related Resources

First annual review of data submitted to the ISMP National Vaccine Errors Reporting Program (VERP).

June 10, 2018

Safety in home care: a mapping review of the international literature.

January 8, 2015

Information technology interventions to improve medication safety in primary care: a systematic review.

December 29, 2014

Laboratory test ordering and results management systems: a qualitative study of safety risks identified by administrators in general practice.

March 12, 2014

Reasons for not reporting patient safety incidents in general practice: a qualitative study.

January 30, 2013

Managing Patients' Medicines after Discharge from Hospital.

May 2, 2012

Routinely recorded patient safety events in primary care: a literature review.

February 10, 2012

Medicines reconciliation using a shared electronic health care record.

September 14, 2011

High risk prescribing in primary care patients particularly vulnerable to adverse drug events: cross sectional population database analysis in Scottish general practice.

July 6, 2011

How safe are patients in primary care?

May 13, 2009

View More

See More About The Topic

Quality and Safety Professionals

Family Medicine

General Internal Medicine

Error Reporting and Analysis

To sign up for updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your email address below.

5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20857
Telephone: (301) 427-1364