Are amended surgical pathology reports getting to the correct responsible care provider? | PSNet

Provide Feedback |

Register

Study

Are amended surgical pathology reports getting to the correct responsible care provider?

July 16, 2014

Parkash V, Domfeh A, Cohen P, et al. Am J Clin Pathol. 2014;142(1):58-63.

View more articles from the same authors.

In this chart review study, amended pathology reports with clinically significant patient results did not reliably reach treating clinicians. Despite prior studies highlighting the shortcomings of test results reporting, this patient safety issue persists.

PubMed citation

Related Resources From the Same Author(s)

Adverse events and perceived abandonment: learning from patients' accounts of medical mishaps.

September 4, 2024

"Apologies" for pathologists: why, when, and how to say "sorry" after committing a medical error.

May 19, 2014

Challenges in communication from referring clinicians to pathologists in the electronic health record era.

June 20, 2018

Learning from tragedy: the Julia Berg story.

December 12, 2018

Implementation of the I-PASS handoff program in diverse clinical environments: a multicenter prospective effectiveness implementation study.

November 16, 2022

The occurrence of potential patient safety events among trauma patients: are they random?

March 3, 2011

Enabling a learning healthcare system with automated computer protocols that produce replicable and personalized clinician actions.

August 4, 2021

Effect of social influences on pharmacists' intention to report adverse drug events.

October 17, 2012

Medication safety in two intensive care units of a community teaching hospital after electronic health record implementation: sociotechnical and human factors engineering considerations.

March 15, 2017

Advancing the science of patient safety.

September 20, 2011

View More

Related Resources

Technology-based closed-loop tracking for improving communication and follow-up of pathology results.

February 2, 2022

What are the implications for patient safety and experience of a major healthcare IT breakdown? A qualitative study.

May 26, 2021

Measuring the rate of manual transcription error in outpatient point-of-care testing.

March 13, 2019

Electronic detection of delayed test result follow-up in patients with hypothyroidism.

April 24, 2018

Communicating findings of delayed diagnostic evaluation to primary care providers.

July 27, 2016

Laboratory medicine handoff gaps experienced by primary care practices: a report from the Shared Networks of Collaborative Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP).

December 3, 2014

Decoding laboratory test names: a major challenge to appropriate patient care.

November 26, 2014

An initiative to improve the management of clinically significant test results in a large health care network.

December 5, 2013

The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review.

March 23, 2012

WebM&M Cases

Amended Lab Results: Communication Slip

February 1, 2012

View More

See More About The Topic

Health Care Providers

Information Professionals

Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Missed or Critical Lab Results

Noncognitive Errors ("Slips and Lapses")

To sign up for updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your email address below.

5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20857
Telephone: (301) 427-1364