Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Commentary

What kinds of insights do Safety-I and Safety-II approaches provide? A critical reflection on the use of SHERPA and FRAM in healthcare.

Sujan M, Lounsbury O, Pickup L, et al. What kinds of insights do Safety-I and Safety-II approaches provide? A critical reflection on the use of SHERPA and FRAM in healthcare. Safety Sci. 2024;173:106450. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106450.

Save
Print
February 21, 2024
Sujan M, Lounsbury O, Pickup L, et al. Safety Sci. 2024;173:106450.
View more articles from the same authors.

The Safety I and Safety II frameworks can be complementary, allowing organizations to focus both on eliminating errors (Safety I) and fostering resilience to understand how things usually go right (Safety II). This article provides an overview of the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction (SHERPA) and Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) and examines their application in managing post-surgical deterioration from the Safety I and Safety II perspectives. 

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Sujan M, Lounsbury O, Pickup L, et al. What kinds of insights do Safety-I and Safety-II approaches provide? A critical reflection on the use of SHERPA and FRAM in healthcare. Safety Sci. 2024;173:106450. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106450.