Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study

Near-miss transcription errors: a comparison of reporting rates between a novel error-reporting mechanism and a current formal reporting system.

South DA, Skelley JW, Dang M, et al. Near-miss transcription errors: a comparison of reporting rates between a novel error-reporting mechanism and a current formal reporting system. Hosp Pharm. 2015;50(2):118-24. doi:10.1310/hpj5002-118.

Save
Print
February 5, 2016
South DA, Skelley JW, Dang M, et al. Hosp Pharm. 2015;50(2):118-24.
View more articles from the same authors.

This observational study compared error detection rates for medication transcription errors between a hospital's formal reporting system and a passive error identification mechanism embedded in ordering software. As with prior studies of incident reporting systems, the formal reporting mechanism identified fewer errors than electronic surveillance, emphasizing the need to build error detection into technology platforms.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

South DA, Skelley JW, Dang M, et al. Near-miss transcription errors: a comparison of reporting rates between a novel error-reporting mechanism and a current formal reporting system. Hosp Pharm. 2015;50(2):118-24. doi:10.1310/hpj5002-118.