Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study

Mix of methods is needed to identify adverse events in general practice: a prospective observational study.

Wetzels R, Wolters R, van Weel C, et al. Mix of methods is needed to identify adverse events in general practice: a prospective observational study. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;9:35. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-9-35.

Save
Print
July 23, 2008
Wetzels R, Wolters R, van Weel C, et al. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;9:35.
View more articles from the same authors.
Five methods of adverse event detection—physician reporting, pharmacist reporting, patient surveys, medical record review, and review of deceased patients—were compared in this study. No single method was unequivocally superior.
Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Wetzels R, Wolters R, van Weel C, et al. Mix of methods is needed to identify adverse events in general practice: a prospective observational study. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;9:35. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-9-35.