Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study
Classic

Managing the prevention of retained surgical instruments: what is the value of counting?

Egorova NN, Moskowitz A, Gelijns A, et al. Managing the prevention of retained surgical instruments: what is the value of counting? Ann Surg. 2008;247(1):13-8.

Save
Print
March 3, 2011
Egorova NN, Moskowitz A, Gelijns A, et al. Ann Surg. 2008;247(1):13-8.
View more articles from the same authors.

Retained foreign bodies pose an ongoing threat to patient safety, with past studies suggesting intraoperative radiographic screening and counting as strategies to prevent their occurrence. This study examined the value of counting surgical instruments and quantified its accuracy in an effort not previously undertaken. Investigators discovered that the counting process prevented only half of retained items and count discrepancies led to increased surgical duration, an event associated with significant costs. The authors suggest that counting alone may not serve as the most effective prevention strategy and raise the role of technological innovations such as radiofrequency detection systems as a solution. An accompanying editorial reflects on the problem of retained foreign bodies in surgery, and a past AHRQ WebM&M commentary discusses an error and death due to a retained sponge.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Egorova NN, Moskowitz A, Gelijns A, et al. Managing the prevention of retained surgical instruments: what is the value of counting? Ann Surg. 2008;247(1):13-8.