Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study

Combining ratings from multiple physician reviewers helped to overcome the uncertainty associated with adverse event classification.

Forster AJ, O'Rourke K, Shojania KG, et al. Combining ratings from multiple physician reviewers helped to overcome the uncertainty associated with adverse event classification. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(9):892-901.

Save
Print
October 4, 2011
Forster AJ, O'Rourke K, Shojania KG, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(9):892-901.
View more articles from the same authors.

This study used Bayesian statistical methodology to evaluate the accuracy of medical error detection by standard retrospective case review. Due to suboptimal inter-rater reliability, use of a single case reviewer tended to overestimate the likelihood of errors, but use of multiple reviewers increased accuracy.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Forster AJ, O'Rourke K, Shojania KG, et al. Combining ratings from multiple physician reviewers helped to overcome the uncertainty associated with adverse event classification. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(9):892-901.