Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Review
Classic

A systematic review of the effects of resident duty hour restrictions in surgery: impact on resident wellness, training, and patient outcomes.

Ahmed N, Devitt KS, Keshet I, et al. A systematic review of the effects of resident duty hour restrictions in surgery: impact on resident wellness, training, and patient outcomes. Ann Surg. 2014;259(6):1041-53. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000595.

Save
Print
July 3, 2016
Ahmed N, Devitt KS, Keshet I, et al. Ann Surg. 2014;259(6):1041-53.
View more articles from the same authors.

The 2011 duty hour regulations for resident physicians were intended to improve patient safety by reducing resident fatigue. Examining the effects of duty-hours reform on surgical trainees, this systematic review concluded that there were no improvements in patient outcomes. Both perceived education and performance on certification exams have declined following reform, and more frequent handoffs have led to safety concerns. Even though some improvements in residents' quality of life were observed after the first duty-hours reform, the subsequent limitation of 16-hour shifts has not enhanced well-being. The authors express concern about current surgery residency training and urge caution prior to reforming graduate medical education further. A previous AHRQ WebM&M perspective explored the impact of duty hours on patient safety.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Ahmed N, Devitt KS, Keshet I, et al. A systematic review of the effects of resident duty hour restrictions in surgery: impact on resident wellness, training, and patient outcomes. Ann Surg. 2014;259(6):1041-53. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000595.