Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Review

Reducing the burden of surgical harm: a systematic review of the interventions used to reduce adverse events in surgery.

Howell A-M, Panesar S, Burns EM, et al. Reducing the burden of surgical harm: a systematic review of the interventions used to reduce adverse events in surgery. Ann Surg. 2014;259(4):630-41. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000371.

Save
Print
October 31, 2014
Howell A-M, Panesar S, Burns EM, et al. Ann Surg. 2014;259(4):630-41.
View more articles from the same authors.

More than 30 years of research has shown that mortality rates after surgery vary widely from hospital to hospital. Surgical safety improvement has been one of the key priorities of the safety movement. This systematic review sought to identify patient care structures and process improvements that have been shown to enhance clinical outcomes of patients undergoing surgery. Among the many interventions tested, this review found that national data-monitoring and feedback programs (e.g., the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and reducing the number of patients per nurse improved morbidity and mortality. Other successful interventions included surgical care pathways and checklists, both of which are being widely implemented. However, the overall quality of literature in this area was relatively poor, particularly for commonly used interventions such as simulation and teamwork training.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Howell A-M, Panesar S, Burns EM, et al. Reducing the burden of surgical harm: a systematic review of the interventions used to reduce adverse events in surgery. Ann Surg. 2014;259(4):630-41. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000371.