Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study

Nature and timing of incidents intercepted by the SURPASS checklist in surgical patients.

de Vries EN, Prins HA, Bennink C, et al. Nature and timing of incidents intercepted by the SURPASS checklist in surgical patients. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(6):503-8. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000347.

Save
Print
May 17, 2012
de Vries EN, Prins HA, Bennink C, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(6):503-8.
View more articles from the same authors.
Checklists have been integral components in some of the most notable successes of the patient safety movement. However, the mechanism by which checklists improve outcomes is not entirely clear. A previously published surgical safety system, centered around detailed checklists for the entire preoperative, operative, and postoperative phases, achieved remarkable improvement in surgical outcomes. This study analyzed the checklists themselves to attempt to discern how they improved safety. At least one potential safety incident was intercepted in almost 40% of patients undergoing surgery. The majority of these were detected postoperatively—even though checklist adherence was lowest in the postoperative period. As prior studies have shown that postoperative care quality likely contributes to hospital-level variations in surgical mortality, this checklist's most important effect likely involved facilitating early detection of postoperative adverse events.
Save
Print
Cite
Citation

de Vries EN, Prins HA, Bennink C, et al. Nature and timing of incidents intercepted by the SURPASS checklist in surgical patients. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(6):503-8. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000347.