Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study

Crowdsourcing a diagnosis? Exploring the accuracy of the size and type of group diagnosis: an experimental study.

Sherbino J, Sibbald M, Norman GR, et al. Crowdsourcing a diagnosis? Exploring the accuracy of the size and type of group diagnosis: an experimental study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024;33(12):790-794. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016695.

Save
Print
April 10, 2024
Sherbino J, Sibbald M, Norman GR, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024;33(12):790-794.
View more articles from the same authors.

Collaboration between clinicians encourages better diagnostic decision making and clinical outcomes. This study sought to determine if collaboration improves diagnostic accuracy, assessing by collaborative group size (3 or 6 physicians) and process type (interactive or retrospective). Groups had better diagnostic accuracy than individuals, regardless of group size. Process types were equally effective.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Sherbino J, Sibbald M, Norman GR, et al. Crowdsourcing a diagnosis? Exploring the accuracy of the size and type of group diagnosis: an experimental study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024;33(12):790-794. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016695.