Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study

Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study.

Lång K, Josefsson V, Larsson A-M, et al. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single…. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(8):936-944. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00298-x.

Save
Print
November 15, 2023
Lång K, Josefsson V, Larsson A-M, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(8):936-944.
View more articles from the same authors.

Retrospective studies have shown artificial intelligence (AI) to be at least as accurate as radiologists in detecting breast cancer in screening mammograms. This prospective randomized trial similarly demonstrated that AI readings were as accurate as double readings by radiologists, but with a significantly reduced workload.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Lång K, Josefsson V, Larsson A-M, et al. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single…. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(8):936-944. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00298-x.